All Living Beings, Not Just Animals, But

Neo-darwinian Language And Conceptual Structure Itself Ensures Scientific Failure: Major Questions Posed By Zoologists Cannot Be Answered From Inside The Neo-darwinian Straitjacket. Such Questions Include, For Example, 'how Do New Structures Arise In Evolution?' 'why, Given So Much Environmental Change, Is Stasis So Prevalent In Evolution As Seen In The Fossil Record?' 'how Did One Group Of Organisms Or Set Of Macromolecules Evolve From Another?' The Importance Of These Questions Is Not At Issue; It Is Just That Neo-darwinians, Restricted By Their Resuppositions, Cannot Answer Them.

The Accumulation Of Genetic Mutations Were Touted To Be Enough To Change One Species To Another….no. It Wasn’t Dishonesty. I Think It Was Wish Fulfillment And Social Momentum. Assumptions, Made But Not Verified, Were Taught As Fact.

Politicians Need A Better Understanding Of Global Ecology. We Need To Be Freed From Our Species-specific Arrogance. No Evidence Exists That We Are Chosen, The Unique Species For Which All The Others Were Made. Nor Are We The Most Important One Because We Are So Numerous, Powerful And Dangerous.

To Me, The Human Move To Take Responsibility For The Living Earth Is Laughable - The Rhetoric Of The Powerless. The Planet Takes Care Of Us, Not We Of It. Our Self-inflated Moral Imperative To Guide A Wayward Earth, Or Heal Our Sick Planet, Is Evidence Of Our Immense Capacity For Self Delusion. Rather, We Need To Protect Ourselves From Ourselves.

Natural Selection Eliminates And Maybe Maintains, But It Doesn't Create.