People Say I Am Against Darwin. That

We Are All Of Us Walking Communities Of Bacteria. The World Shimmers, A Pointillist Landscape Made Of Tiny Living Beings.

Life On Earth Is More Like A Verb. It Repairs, Maintains, Re-creates, And Outdoes Itself.

The Notion Of Saving The Planet Has Nothing To Do With Intellectual Honesty Or Science. The Fact Is That The Planet Was Here Long Before Us And Will Be Here Long After Us. The Planet Is Running Fine. What People Are Talking About Is Saving Themselves And Saving Their Middle-class Lifestyles And Saving Their Cash Flow.

Neo-darwinian Language And Conceptual Structure Itself Ensures Scientific Failure: Major Questions Posed By Zoologists Cannot Be Answered From Inside The Neo-darwinian Straitjacket. Such Questions Include, For Example, 'how Do New Structures Arise In Evolution?' 'why, Given So Much Environmental Change, Is Stasis So Prevalent In Evolution As Seen In The Fossil Record?' 'how Did One Group Of Organisms Or Set Of Macromolecules Evolve From Another?' The Importance Of These Questions Is Not At Issue; It Is Just That Neo-darwinians, Restricted By Their Resuppositions, Cannot Answer Them.

Everybody Knows What A Caterpillar Is, And It Doesn't Look Anything Like A Butterfly.