This Is So Absurd That It Has,

The Court's Decision Reflects The Philosophy That Judges Should Endure Whatever Interpretive Distortions It Takes In Order To Correct A Supposed Flaw In The Statutory Machinery. That Philosophy Ignores The American People's Decision To Give Congress '[a]ll Legislative Powers' Enumerated In The Constitution. They Made Congress, Not This Court, Responsible For Both Making Laws And Mending Them.

It Is Difficult To Maintain The Illusion That We Are Interpreting A Constitution, Rather Than Inventing One.

[the] Government Has Room To Scale Back Individual Rights During Wartime Without Violating The Constitution. The Constitution Just Sets Minimums. Most Of The Rights That You Enjoy Go Way Beyond What The Constitution Requires.

Certainly The Constitution Does Not Require Discrimination On The Basis Of Sex. The Only Issue Is Whether It Prohibits It. It Doesn't.

Why In The World Would You Have It Interpreted By Nine Lawyers?