The Principal Purpose Of Stare Decisis Is

To Be Honest About It, That Is The View Of Christians Taken By Modern Society. Surely Those Who Adhere To All Or Most Of These Traditional Christian Beliefs Are To Be Regarded As Simpleminded.

That's The Argument Of Flexibility And It Goes Something Like This: The Constitution Is Over 200 Years Old And Societies Change. It Has To Change With Society, Like A Living Organism, Or It Will Become Brittle And Break. But You Would Have To Be An Idiot To Believe That. The Constitution Is Not A Living Organism; It Is A Legal Document. It Says Something And Doesn't Say Other Things.

This Is So Absurd That It Has, To My Knowledge, Never Been Contemplated.

Rather Than Rewriting The Law Under The Pretense Of Interpreting It, The Court Should Have Left It To Congress To Decide What To Do About The Act's Limitation Of Tax Credits To State Exchanges.

Nowhere Else In The Constitution Does A "right" Attributed To "the People" Refer To Anything Other Than An Individual Right. What Is More, In All Six Other Provisions Of The Constitution That Mention "the People," The Term Unambiguously Refers To All Members Of The Political Community, Not An Unspecified Subset... The Second Amendment Extends, Prima Facie, To All Instruments That Constitute Bearable Arms... The Very Text Of The Second Amendment Implicitly Recognizes The Pre-existence Of The Right And Declares Only That It "shall Not Be Infringed."