There Can Be No Doubt That The

[the Current Governing Judicial Philosophy Is:] If You Want Something Passionately Enough, It Is Guaranteed By The Constitution. No Need To Fiddle Around Gathering Votes From Recalcitrant Citizens.

Conservatives . . . May Decide To Join The Game And Seek Activist Judges With Conservative Views. Should That Come To Pass, Those Who Have Tempted The Courts To Political Judging Will Have Gained Nothing For Themselves But Will Have Destroyed A Great And Essential Institution. . . . There Are Only Two Sides. Either The Constitution And Statutes Are Law, Which Means Their Principles Are Known And Control Judges, Or They Are Malleable Texts That Judges May Rewrite To See That Particular Groups Or Political Causes Win.

Law Is Vulnerable To The Winds Of Intellectual Or Moral Fashion, Which It Then Validates As The Commands Of Our Most Basic Concept

If The Children Already Born Each Have Only Two Children Themselves ... In Twenty-seven To Thirty-five Years The Population Of The World Will Double.

By Depriving The Charged Person Of Any Defenses [the Rulings] Mean That Sexual Dalliance, However Voluntarily Engaged In, Becomes Harassment Whenever An Employee Sees Fit, After The Fact, So To Characterize It.