The Traditional Statement About Language Is That

The Only Attitude (the Only Politics--judicial, Medical, Pedagogical And So Forth) I Would Absolutely Condemn Is One Which, Directly Or Indirectly, Cuts Off The Possibility Of An Essentially Interminable Questioning, That Is, An Effective And Thus Transforming Questioning.

I Am Like A Child Ready For The Apocalypse, I Am The Apocalypse Itself, That Is To Say, The Ultimate And First Event Of The End, The Unveiling And The Verdict.

I Rightly Pass For An Atheist.

Such A Caring For Death, An Awakening That Keeps Vigil Over Death, A Conscience That Looks Death In The Face, Is Another Name For Freedom.

The End Of Man (as A Factual Anthropological Limit) Is Announced To Thought From The Vantage Of The End Of Man (as A Determined Opening Or The Infinity Of A Telos ). Man Is That Which Is In Relation To His End, In The Fundamentally Equivocal Sense Of The Word. Since Always.