The Socialist Society Would Have To Forbid

You Can't Satisfy Everybody; Especially If There Are Those Who Will Be Dissatisfied Unless Not Everybody Is Satisfied.

The Trouble With Government Regulation Of The Market Is That It Prohibits Capitalistic Acts Between Consenting Adults.

Whoever Makes Something Having Bought Or Contracted For All Other Held Resources Used In The Process (transferring Some Of His Holdings For These Cooperating Factors), Is Entitled To It. The Situation Is Not One Of Something's Getting Made, And There Being An Open Question Of Who Is To Get It. Things Come Into The World Already Attached To People Having Entitlements Over Them.

What Hadn't Been Realized In The Literature Until Now Is That Merely To Describe How Severely Something Has Been Tested In The Past Itself Embodies Inductive Assumptions, Even As A Statement About The Past.

I Think Philosophers Can Do Things Akin To Theoretical Scientists, In That, Having Read About Empirical Data, They Too Can Think Of What Hypotheses And Theories Might Account For That Data. So There's A Continuity Between Philosophy And Science In That Way.