No State More Extensive Than The Minimal

Why Are Philosophers Intent On Forcing Others To Believe Things? Is That A Nice Way To Behave Towards Someone?

The Trouble With Government Regulation Of The Market Is That It Prohibits Capitalistic Acts Between Consenting Adults.

Is There Really Someone Who, Searching For A Group Of Wise And Sensitive Persons To Regulate Him For His Own Good, Would Choose That Group Of People That Constitute The Membership Of Both Houses Of Congress?

Some People Steal From Others, Or Defraud Them, Or Enslave Them, Seizing Their Product And Preventing Them From Living As They Choose, Or Forcibly Exclude Others From Competing In Exchanges. None Of These Are Permissible Modes Of Transition From One Situation To Another.

Given The Complexity Of Interpersonal Relationships And Institutions And The Complexity Of Co-ordination Of The Actions Of Many People, It Is Enormously Unlikely That, Even If There Were One Ideal Pattern For Society, It Could Be Arrived At In An A Priori Fashion. And Even Supposing That Some Great Genius Did Come Along With A Blueprint, Who Could Have The Confidence That It Could Work