The One Who Insists On Never Uttering

What We Observe Is Not Nature Itself But Nature Exposed To Our Method Of Questioning. Our Scientific Work In Physics Consists In Asking Questions About Nature In The Language That We Possess And Trying To Get An Answer From Experiment By The Means That Are At Our Disposal.

The More Precise The Measurement Of Position, The More Imprecise The Measurement Of Momentum, And Vice Versa.

If Nature Leads Us To Mathematical Forms Of Great Simplicity And Beauty - By Forms I Am Referring To Coherent Systems Of Hypothesis, Axioms, Etc. - To Forms That No One Has Previously Encountered, We Cannot Help Thinking That They Are "true," That They Reveal A Genuine Feature Of Nature... You Must Have Felt This Too: The Almost Frightening Simplicity And Wholeness Of Relationships Which Nature Suddenly Spreads Out Before Us And For Which None Of Us Was In The Least Prepared.

The Very Act Of Observing Disturbs The System.

By Getting To Smaller And Smaller Units, We Do Not Come To Fundamental Or Indivisible Units. But We Do Come To A Point Where Further Division Has No Meaning.