The Fastest Growing Occupation In The Private

I Think That It's Difficult To Talk About Large Questions Of Economics Or Social Policy Without Understanding The Building Blocks Of Society. And Those Building Blocks Are Organizations, The People Who Run Them, And The People Who Work In Them.

As To The Meaning Of "corporate Social Responsibility," Friedman And I Would Agree: If A Certain Action Improves The Corporation's Bottom Line, There's No Point In Labeling It "socially Responsible." It's Just Good Business.

The Silent Majority Really Is A Liberal Majority, Even Though The Word Liberal Has Taken A Real Beating Over The Last 20 Years By Radical Conservatives.

In The Early 1970s, Milton Friedman Argued That Corporations Should Not Be Socially Responsible Because They Had No Mandate To Be; They Existed To Make Money, Not To Be Charitable Institutions. But In The Economy Of The 21st Century, Corporations Cannot Be Socially Responsible, If Social Responsibility Is Understood To Mean Sacrificing Profits For The Sake Of Some Perceived Social Good. That's Because Competition Has Become So Much More Intense.

A Funny Thing Happened To The First Amendment On Its Way To The Public Forum. According To The Supreme Court, Money Is Now Speech And Corporations Are Now People. But When Real People Without Money Assemble To Express Their Dissatisfaction With The Political Consequences Of This, They’re Treated As Public Nuisances And Evicted.