Ours Is An Accusatorial, And Not An

The Words Of The Constitution... Are So Unrestricted By Their Intrinsic Meaning Or By Their History Or By Tradition Or By Prior Decisions That They Leave The Individual Justice Free, If Indeed They Do Not Compel Him, To Gather Meaning Not From Reading The Constitution But From Reading Life.

For The Highest Exercise Of Judicial Duty Is To Subordinate One's Personal Pulls And One's Private Views To The Law Of Which We Are All Guaradians - Those Impersonal Convictions That Made A Society A Civilized Community, And Not The Victims Of Personal Rule.

Answers Are Not Obtained By Putting The Wrong Question And Thereby Begging The Real One.

If Nowhere Else, In The Relation Between Church And State, "good Fences Make Good Neighbors."

Ultimately There Can Be No Freedom For Self Unless It Is Vouchsafed For Others; There Can Be No Security Where There Is Fear, And A Democratic Society Presupposes Confidence And Candor In The Relations Of Men With One Another And Eager Collaboration For The Larger Ends Of Life Instead Of The Pursuit Of Petty, Selfish Or Vainglorious Aims.