It's Important To Every American That The

Active Liberty Is Particularly At Risk When Law Restricts Speech Directly Related To The Shaping Of Public Opinion, For Example, Speech That Takes Place In Areas Related To Politics And Policy-making By Elected Officials. That Special Risk Justifies Especially Strong Pro-speech Judicial Presumptions. It Also Justifies Careful Review Whenever The Speech In Question Seeks To Shape Public Opinion, Particularly If That Opinion In Turn Will Affect The Political Process And The Kind Of Society In Which We Live.

Nobody Wants A Judge To Be Subject To The Political Whim Of The Moment.

The Advantages? Exercise, No Parking Problems, Gas Prices, It's Fun. An Automobile Is Expensive. You Have To Find A Place To Park And It's Not Fun. So Why Not Ride A Bicycle? I Recommend It.

I Think Whether You Are A Judge On My Court Or Whether You Are A Judge On A Court Of Appeals Or Any Court, And Lawyers Too - And If You're Interested In Law Yourself, You'll Be In The Same Situation - You Have A Text That Isn't Clear. If The Text Is Clear, You Follow The Text. If The Text Isn't Clear, You Have To Work Out What It Means. And That Requires Context.

I Mean, There Are Lots Of People Who Get Married Who Can't Have Children. To Take A State That Does Allow Adoption And Say-there, What Is The Justification For Saying No Gay Marriage? Certainly Not The One You Said, Is It?