I Went Through The Standard Scientific Atheist

When People See One Of These New Forms Of Art For The First Time, Often They Can't Make Sense Of It. Then, If It's Around Long Enough, A Lot Of People Get Used To It And It Becomes Assimilated Into Culture. So There's A Morphic Field Both For The Kind Of Art And For The Appreciation Of It.

The Assumption That The Laws Of Nature Are Eternal Is A Vestige Of The Christian Belief System That Informed The Early Postulates Of Modern Science In The Seventeenth Century. Perhaps The Laws Of Nature Have Actually Evolved Along With Nature Itself, And Perhaps They Are Still Evolving. Or Perhaps They Are Not Laws At All, But More Like Habits.

The Facts Of Science Are Real Enough, And So Are The Techniques That Scientists Use, And So Are The Technologies Based On Them. But The Belief System That Governs Conventional Scientific Thinking Is An Act Of Faith.

At The Moment Of Insight, A Potential Pattern Of Organized Behavior Comes Into Being.

I Think That Creativity Depends On Having Sufficient Indeterminacy Around For A New Pattern To Arise Up Within It.