I Even Accept For The Sake Of

There Is Nothing New In The Realization That The Constitution Sometimes Insulates The Criminality Of A Few In Order To Protect The Privacy Of Us All.

[the] Government Has Room To Scale Back Individual Rights During Wartime Without Violating The Constitution. The Constitution Just Sets Minimums. Most Of The Rights That You Enjoy Go Way Beyond What The Constitution Requires.

The Court's Decision Reflects The Philosophy That Judges Should Endure Whatever Interpretive Distortions It Takes In Order To Correct A Supposed Flaw In The Statutory Machinery. That Philosophy Ignores The American People's Decision To Give Congress '[a]ll Legislative Powers' Enumerated In The Constitution. They Made Congress, Not This Court, Responsible For Both Making Laws And Mending Them.

It's A Long, Uphill Fight To Get Back To Original Orthodoxy. We Have Two 'originalists' On The Supreme Court. That's Something.

The Virtue Of A Democratic System With A [constitutionally Guaranteed Right To Free Speech] Is That It Readily Enables The People, Over Time, To Be Persuaded That What They Took For Granted Is Not So, And To Change Their Laws Accordingly.