For In Order For Capitalism To Work

To Allow The Policy Question Of Same-sex Marriage To Be Considered And Resolved By A Select, Patrician, Highly Unrepresentative Panel Of Nine Is To Violate A Principle Even More Fundamental Than No Taxation Without Representation: No Social Transformation Without Representation.

If It Were Up To Me, I Would Put In Jail Every Sandal-wearing, Scruffy-bearded Weirdo Who Burns The American Flag. But I Am Not King.

What Is A Moderate Interpretation Of The Text? Halfway Between What It Really Means And What You'd Like It To Mean?

The Constitution Does Not Trust Judges To Make Determinations Of Criminal Guilt.

The Court's Job Is To Uphold The Constitution And You Don't Call That Off In Times Of Crisis. Would The Framers Have Allowed This Practice?