As In Laws Or In War, The

In Any Case, The Fear Of Subservience Is Quite Imaginary.

I Know That Buddhism Is To Hinduism What Protestantism Is To Roman Catholicism, Only In A Much Stronger Light, To A Much Greater Degree.

I Have Been Repeating Over And Over Again That He Who Cannot Protect Himself Or His Nearest And Dearest Or Their Honour By Non-violently Facing Death May And Ought To Do So By Violently Dealing With The Oppressor. He Who Can Do Neither Of The Two Is A Burden. He Has No Business To Be The Head Of A Family. He Must Either Hide Himself, Or Must Rest Content To Live For Ever In Helplessness And Be Prepared To Crawl Like A Worm At The Bidding Of A Bully.

Coal Is Not Dear For The Coal-miner Who Can Use It There And Then, Nor Is Khadi Dear For The Villager Who Manufactures His Own Khadi.

Nonviolence Of The Strong Cannot Be A Mere Policy. It Must Be A Creed, Or A Passion, If 'creed' Is Objected To.