As A Theist I Believe That God

No Doubt It Is True That Science Cannot Study God, But It Hardly Follows That God Had To Keep A Safe Distance From Everything That Scientists Want To Study.

The Second Advantage Claimed For Naturalism Is That It Is Equivalent To Rationality, Because It Assumes A Model Of Reality In Which All Events Are In Principle Accessible To Scientific Investigation.

The Problem With Allowing God A Role In The History Of Life Is Not That Science Would Cease, But Rather That Scientists Would Have To Acknowledge The Existence Of Something Important Which Is Outside The Boundaries Of Natural Science.

Most Importantly, I Agree That The Truth Of These Matters Should Be Determined By Interpretation Of Scientific Evidence - Experiments, Fossil Studies And The Like.

Scientists Have Long Known That Darwinism Is False. They Have Adhered To The Myth Out Of Self-interest And A Zealous Desire To Put Down God.