Modernist Discourse [...] Incorporates Semantic Devices -

No Doubt It Is True That Science Cannot Study God, But It Hardly Follows That God Had To Keep A Safe Distance From Everything That Scientists Want To Study.

A Chinese Paleontologist Lectures Around The World Saying That Recent Fossil Finds In His Country Are Inconsistent With The Darwinian Theory Of Evolution. His Reason: The Major Animal Groups Appear Abruptly In The Rocks Over A Relatively Short Time, Rather Than Evolving Gradually From A Common Ancestor As Darwin's Theory Predicts. When This Conclusion Upsets American Scientists, He Wryly Comments: "in China We Can Criticize Darwin But Not The Government. In America You Can Criticize The Government But Not Darwin."

Evolutionary Naturalism Takes The Inherent Limitations Of Science And Turns Them Into A Devastating Philosophical Weapon: Because Science Is Our Only Real Way Of Knowing Anything, What Science Cannot Know Cannot Be Real.

This [the Intelligent Design Movement] Isn't Really, And Never Has Been, A Debate About Science, It's About Religion And Philosophy.

We're Not Trying To Prove The Character Of God Through Science. That's A Bad Idea. What I'm Trying To Do Is Clear Away The Misunderstandings, The Debris That Prevent People From Accepting That God Who Wants To Accept Them.