You’re Nothing But A Pack Of Neurons.

If Watson And I Had Not Discovered The [dna] Structure, Instead Of Being Revealed With A Flourish It Would Have Trickled Out And That Its Impact Would Have Been Far Less. For This Sort Of Reason Stent Had Argued That A Scientific Discovery Is More Akin To A Work Of Art Than Is Generally Admitted. Style, He Argues, Is As Important As Content. I Am Not Completely Convinced By This Argument, At Least In This Case.

You’re Nothing But A Pack Of Neurons.

It Has Yet To Be Shown By Direct Biochemical Methods, As Opposed To The Indirect Genetic Evidence Mentioned Earlier, That The Code Is Indeed A Triplet Code.

One Of The Most Frightening Things In The Western World, And In This Country In Particular, Is The Number Of People Who Believe In Things That Are Scientifically False. If Someone Tells Me That The Earth Is Less Than 10,000 Years Old, In My Opinion He Should See A Psychiatrist.

What Could Be More Foolish Than To Base One's Entire View Of Life On Ideas That, However Plausible At The Time, Now Appear To Be Quite Erroneous? And What Would Be More Important Than To Find Our True Place In The Universe By Removing One By One These Unfortunate Vestiges Of Earlier Beliefs?