Why Can't The State Accede To The

Scalia Said The Court Had Pretty Much Signed On To The So-called Homosexual Agenda, Adding: Let Me Be Clear That I Have Nothing Against Homosexuals, Or Any Other Group, Promoting Their Agenda Through Normal Democratic Means.

The Constitution Does Not Trust Judges To Make Determinations Of Criminal Guilt.

We Should Start Calling This Law Scotuscare ... [t]his Court's Two Decisions On The Act Will Surely Be Remembered Through The Years ... And The Cases Will Publish Forever The Discouraging Truth That The Supreme Court Of The United States Favors Some Laws Over Others, And Is Prepared To Do Whatever It Takes To Uphold And Assist Its Favorites.

A Bill Of Rights That Means What The Majority Wants It To Mean Is Worthless.

It Is A Constitution That Morphs While You Look At It Like Plasticman.... That Is Contrary To Our Whole Tradition, To In God We Trust On The Coins, To Thanksgiving Proclamations, To (congressional) Chaplains, To Tax Exemption For Places Of Worship, Which Has Always Existed In America.