When A Judge Assumes The Power To

When A Judge Goes Beyond [his Proper Function] And Reads Entirely New Values Into The Constitution, Values The Framers And Ratifiers Did Not Put There, He Deprives The People Of Their Liberty. That Liberty, Which The Constitution Clearly Envisions, Is The Liberty Of The People To Set Their Own Social Agenda Through The Process Of Democracy.

In A Constitutional Democracy The Moral Content Of Law Must Be Given By The Morality Of The Framer Or Legislator, Never By The Morality Of The Judge.

When A Judge Assumes The Power To Decide Which Distinctions Made In A Statute Are Legitimate And Which Are Not, He Assumes The Power To Disapprove Of Any And All Legislation, Because All Legislation Makes Distinctions

One Man's Larceny Is Another's Just Distribution Of Goods.

[the Current Governing Judicial Philosophy Is:] If You Want Something Passionately Enough, It Is Guaranteed By The Constitution. No Need To Fiddle Around Gathering Votes From Recalcitrant Citizens.