There's No Reason For The Electors To

A Time Is Marked Not So Much By Ideas That Are Argued About As By Ideas That Are Taken For Granted. The Character Of An Era Hangs Upon What Needs No Defense.

There Is Nothing More Dangerous Than A Government Of The Many Controlled By The Few.

A Free Culture Supports And Protects Creators And Innovators. It Does This Directly By Granting Intellectual Property Rights. But It Does So Indirectly By Limiting The Reach Of Those Rights, To Guarantee That Follow-on Creators And Innovators Remain As Free As Possible From The Control Of The Past. A Free Culture Is Not A Culture Without Property, Just As A Free Market Is Not A Market In Which Everything Is Free. The Opposite Of A Free Culture Is A "permission Culture" -- A Culture In Which Creators Get To Create Only With The Permission Of The Powerful, Or Of Creators From The Past.

[conservatives] Go To Church, They Do Lots Of Things For Free For Each Other. They Hold Potluck Dinners. ... They Serve Food To Poor People. They Share, They Give, They Give Away For Free. It's The Very Same People Leading Wall Street Firms Who, On Sundays, Show Up And Share.

A Culture Without Property, Or In Which Creators Can't Get Paid, Is Anarchy, Not Freedom.