The Value Of Other People Is That

We Already Have Plenty Of Fundamentalism And Fundamental Sects Like For Instance Rabbi Schneerson And Chabad Lubavitch. They Feel More Secure Because They Are In The Warm, Caring/sharing Community. This Is The Difference Between Community (gemeinschaft) And What Ferdinand Tönnies Called Gesellschaft: A Kind Of Setting In Which You Have No Rights To Do Anything Unless You Pay For It, And No Right To Get Anything Unless You Prove That You Are 'credit Worthy'. In A Gemeinschaft, However, You Have A Place At The Table Guaranteed Whatever Happens.

Partnerships Are Increasingly Seen Through The Prism Of Promises And Expectations, And As A Kind Of Product For Consumers: Satisfaction On The Spot, And If Not Fully Satisfied, Return The Product To The Shop Or Replace It With A New And Improved One! You Don't, After All, Stick To Your Car, Or Computer, Or Ipod, When Better Ones Appear.

Once Upon A Time There Were The Pampas In Argentina, That People Could Treat As "empty Lands" And Where They Could Run Away From Their Problems From Problem-ridden Homes. That Eventuality Is No Longer Available.

"community" Came To Be Seen As A Chat-group: You Switch On As Long As Your Pleasure Lasts, Then Push Another Button And Switch Off. Very Easy To Go In And Out, Join And Leave.

Ideally, Nothing Should Be Embraced By A Consumer Firmly, Nothing Should Command A Commitment Till Death Do Us Part, No Needs Should Be Seen As Fully Satisfied, No Desires Considered Ultimate. There Ought To Be A Proviso 'until Further Notice' Attached To Any Oath Of Loyalty And Any Commitment. It Is But The Volatility, The In-built Temporality Of All Engagements That Truly Counts; It Counts More Than The Commitment Itself, Which Is Anyway Not Allowed To Outlast The Time Necessary For Consuming The Object Of Desire (or, Rather, The Time Sufficient For The Desirability Of That Object To Wane).