The Structure Underlying The Phenomena Is Not

[t]he Atoms Or Elementary Particles Themselves Are Not Real; They Form A World Of Potentialities Or Possibilities Rather Than One Of Things Or Facts.

It Is Probably True Quite Generally That In The History Of Human Thinking The Most Fruitful Developments Frequently Take Place At Those Points Where Two Different Lines Of Thought Meet. These Lines May Have Their Roots In Quite Different Parts Of Human Nature, In Different Times Or Different Cultural Environments Or Different Religious Traditions: Hence If They Actually Meet, That Is, If They Are At Least So Much Related To Each Other That A Real Interaction Can Take Place, Then One May Hope That New And Interesting Developments May Follow.

Many People Will Tell You That An Expert Is Someone Who Knows A Great Deal About The Subject. To This I Would Object That One Can Never Know Much About Any Subject. I Would Much Prefer The Following Definition: An Expert Is Someone Who Knows Some Of The Worst Mistakes That Can Be Made In The Subject, And How To Avoid Them.

We Will Have To Abandon The Philosophy Of Democritus And The Concept Of Elementary Particles. We Should Accept Instead The Concept Of Elementary Symmetries.

The Ontology Of Materialism Rested Upon The Illusion That The Kind Of Existence, The Direct "actuality" Of The World Around Us, Can Be Extrapolated Into The Atomic Range. This Extrapolation Is Impossible, However.