The Question Rather Is How We Should

Thus, In Its Relation To Christianity, Intelligent Design Should Be Viewed As A Ground-clearing Operation That Gets Rid Of The Intellectual Rubbish That For Generations Has Kept Christianity From Receiving Serious Consideration.

Thus, In A Crucial Way, The Kansas Hearings Repeat The Pattern Set By The Scopes Trial, Which Has Been Repeated Many Times Since, Namely, Evolutionists Escaped Critical Scrutiny By Not Having To Undergo Cross-examination. In This Case, They Accomplished The Feat By Boycotting The Hearings. I Therefore Await The Day When The Hearings Are Not Voluntary But Involve Subpoenas That Compel Evolutionists To Be Deposed And Interrogated At Length On Their Views.

Wrong People Are Wrong Because They Use Their Freedom To Deny It To Others.

The Fundamental Claim Of Intelligent Design Is Straightforward And Easily Intelligible: Namely, There Are Natural Systems That Cannot Be Adequately Explained In Terms Of Undirected Natural Forces And That Exhibit Features Which In Any Other Circumstance We Would Attribute To Intelligence.

As Far As Design Theorists Are Concerned, Theistic Evolution Is American Evangelicalism's Ill-conceived Accommodation To Darwinism .