The Only Way To Keep A Secret

We Don't Have Sources Who Are Dissidents On Other Sources. Should They Come Forward, That Would Be A Tricky Situation For Us, But We're Presumably Acting In Such A Way That People Feel Morally Compelled To Continue Our Mission, Not To Screw It Up.

We Like To Engage In A Normal Publishing Effort, Which Is To Act In A Responsible Manner And Make Sure The Material Is Not Likely To Harm Anyone, That It Is Properly Investigated By Quality News Organizations, And By Lawyers And Human Rights Groups And So On.

The Penetration Of Society By The Internet And The Penetration Of The Internet By Society Is The Best Thing That Has Ever Happened To Global Human Civilisation.

That Was A Brave And Principled Thing For Ecuador To Do [give Me Asylum Application]. Now We Have The U.s. Election [campaign], The Ecuadorian Election Is In February Next Year, And You Have The White House Feeling The Political Heat As A Result Of The True Information That We Have Been Publishing.

I Want To Set Up A New Standard: ‘scientific Journalism.’ If You Publish A Paper On Dna, You Are Required, By All The Good Biological Journals, To Submit The Data That Has Informed Your Research—the Idea Being That People Will Replicate It, Check It, Verify It. So This Is Something That Needs To Be Done For Journalism As Well. There Is An Immediate Power Imbalance, In That Readers Are Unable To Verify What They Are Being Told, And That Leads To Abuse.