Neoliberalism Isn't An Economic Program - It's

One Of The Fairly Interesting Things About Money Is That It Makes Certain Things Possible That Wouldn't Be Possible Otherwise - It Doesn't Make Them Inevitable. Hence The Strange Blindness Of Economists To What Would Actually Happen When One Does Exchange Things If There Isn't Money In Such Contexts.

You Would Think That If Neoliberals Were In Any Way Honest, After The Collapse Of The Soviet Union The First Thing To Do Is Get Rid Of The Red Army And The Kgb, And Build Up The Economy. Instead, They Just Get Rid Of The Economy And Keep The Military And The Kgb.

Money Has Always Been A Particular Problem For Revolutionaries And Anti-capitalists. What Will Money Look Like 'after The Revolution'? How Will It Function? Will It Exist At All? It's Hard To Answer The Question If You Don't Know What Money Actually Is. Proposing To Eliminate It Entirely Seems Utopian And Naive.

Anarchism And Anthropology Go Well Together Because Anthropologists Know That A Society Without A State Is Possible Because So Many Exist.

Debt Is The Most Effective Way To Take A Relation Of Violent Subordination And Make The Victims Feel That It's Their Fault.