Liberal Papers Are Not Necessarily Liberal.

My Answer Is That [donald] Trump Would Not Be Permitted To Win. Why Do I Say That? Because He's Had Every Establishment Off Side; Trump Doesn't Have One Establishment, Maybe With The Exception Of The Evangelicals, If You Can Call Them An Establishment, But Banks, Intelligence [agencies], Arms Companies... Big Foreign Money ... Are All United Behind Hillary Clinton, And The Media As Well, Media Owners And Even Journalists Themselves.

It Is The Role Of Good Journalism To Take On Powerful Abusers, And When Powerful Abusers Are Taken On, There's Always A Bad Reaction. So We See That Controversy, And We Believe That Is A Good Thing To Engage In.

It Is The Media That Controls The Boundaries Of What Is Politically Permissible, So Better To Change The Media. Profit Motives Work Against It, But If We Can Have The Audience Understand That Most Other Forms Of Journalism Are Not Credible, Then It May Be A Forced Move.

Intelligence Agencies Keep Things Secret Because They Often Violate The Rule Of Law Or Of Good Behavior.

That's A Problem. I Mean, Like Any Sort Of Growing Startup Organization, We Are Sort Of Overwhelmed By Our Growth, And That Means We're Getting Enormous Quantity Of Whistleblower Disclosures Of A Very High Caliber But Don't Have Enough People To Actually Process And Vet This Information.