It Doesn't Help To Fight Crime To

You Can Have Many Different Selection Systems, But The Bottom Line Has To Be A System That, Once The Judge Takes Office That Judge Will Feel That He Or She Is To Decide The Case Without Reference To The Popular Thing Or The Popular Will Of The Moment

The Advantages? Exercise, No Parking Problems, Gas Prices, It's Fun. An Automobile Is Expensive. You Have To Find A Place To Park And It's Not Fun. So Why Not Ride A Bicycle? I Recommend It.

And The Problem Is Once You Get Into This Campaign Business And Begin To Have A Lot Of Money, Then The Person On The Bench Begins To Think - What's Going To Happen If I Decide The Case This Way Or That Way?

This Understanding, Underlying Constitutional Interpretation Since The New Deal, Reflects The Constitution's Demands For Structural Flexibility Sufficient To Adapt Substantive Laws And Institutions To Rapidly Changing Social, Economic, And Technological Conditions.

Active Liberty Is Particularly At Risk When Law Restricts Speech Directly Related To The Shaping Of Public Opinion, For Example, Speech That Takes Place In Areas Related To Politics And Policy-making By Elected Officials. That Special Risk Justifies Especially Strong Pro-speech Judicial Presumptions. It Also Justifies Careful Review Whenever The Speech In Question Seeks To Shape Public Opinion, Particularly If That Opinion In Turn Will Affect The Political Process And The Kind Of Society In Which We Live.