Intelligent Design, Unlike Creationism, Is A Science

The Positive Evidence For Darwinism Is Confined To Small-scale Evolutionary Changes Like Insects Developing Insecticide Resistance....evidence Like That For Insecticide Resistance Confirms The Darwinian Selection Mechanism For Small-scale Changes, But Hardly Warrants The Grand Extrapolation That Darwinists Want. It Is A Huge Leap Going From Insects Developing Insecticide Resistance Via The Darwinian Mechanism Of Natural Selection And Random Variation To The Very Emergence Of Insects In The First Place By That Same Mechanism.

Christ Is Indispensable To Any Scientific Theory, Even If Its Practitioners Do Not Have A Clue About Him.

Precisely Because Intelligent Design Does Not Turn The Study Of Biological Origins Into A Bible-science Controversy, Intelligent Design Is A Position Around Which Christians Of All Stripes Can Unite.

You Have To Understand, In The Current Academic Climate, Intelligent Design Is Like Leprosy Or Heresy In Times Past. To Be Tagged As An Id Supporter Is To Become An Academic Pariah, And This Holds Even At So-called Christian Institutions That Place A Premium On Respectability At The Expense Of Truth And The Offense Of The Gospel.

Scientists Rightly Resist Invoking The Supernatural In Scientific Explanations For Fear Of Committing A God-of-the-gaps Fallacy (the Fallacy Of Using God As A Stop-gap For Ignorance). Yet Without Some Restriction On The Use Of Chance, Scientists Are In Danger Of Committing A Logically Equivalent Fallacy-one We May Call The “chance-of-the-gaps Fallacy.” Chance, Like God, Can Become A Stop-gap For Ignorance.