In The Largest Scheme Of Things, Just

The Question We Should Be Asking Is Not Why People Are Sometimes Cruel, Or Even Why A Few People Are Usually Cruel (all Evidence Suggests True Sadists Are An Extremely Small Proportion Of The Population Overall), But How We Have Come To Create Institutions That Encourage Such Behavior And That Suggest Cruel People Are In Some Ways Admirable-or At Least As Deserving Of Sympathy As Those They Push Around.

Capitalism Is Like This Fractal Thing Where Anything That Contains An Element Of Capitalism Anywhere Inside It Is Just Something That Turns Into Capitalism. It Is An Incredibly Defeatist Attitude. If You Choose To Look At Reality That Way, I Suppose You Can, But You Have To Do Enormous Violence To Reality To Do So Consistently.

Anarchism And Anthropology Go Well Together Because Anthropologists Know That A Society Without A State Is Possible Because So Many Exist.

Debt - Like Sin - Implies That One Party In The Transaction Didn't Live Up To Expectations, At Least In The Moment, And Has Done Something Wrong.

Look At Labor Policy. What's The Point Of Making Everybody Work Too Much? It's Not Very Useful. It Is Destroying The Planet, Actually. But It's Great At Keeping People Off The Streets.