In Order To Say That Some Function

I Believe The Evidence Strongly Supports Common Descent. But The Root Question Remains Unanswered: What Has Caused Complex Systems To Form?

The Strong Appearance Of Design [in Nature] Allows A Disarmingly Simple Argument: If It Looks, Walks And Quacks Like A Duck, Then, Absent Compelling Evidence To The Contrary, We Have Warrant To Conclude It's A Duck. Design Should Not Be Overlooked Simply Because It's So Obvious.

Irreducible Complexity Is A Problem For Darwinian Evolution. Whenever We See These Complex Functional Systems We Realise That They Have To Be Designed.

There Is No Publication In The Scientific Literature - In Prestigious Journals, Specialty Journals, Or Books - That Describes How Molecular Evolution Of Any Real, Complex Biochemical System Either Did Occur Or Even Might Have Occurred.

Despite Some Remaining Puzzles, There's No Reason To Doubt That Darwin Had This Point Right, That All Creatures On Earth Are Biological Relatives