I Will Argue That In The Literal

Where Consciousness Is Concerned, The Appearance Is The Reality.

You Can't *discover* That The Brain Is A Digital Computer. You Can Only *interpret* The Brain As A Digital Computer.

There Is No Success Or Failure In Nature.

The General Nature Of The Speech Act Fallacy Can Be Stated As Follows, Using "good" As Our Example. Calling Something Good Is Characteristically Praising Or Commending Or Recommending It, Etc. But It Is A Fallacy To Infer From This That The Meaning Of "good" Is Explained By Saying It Is Used To Perform The Act Of Commendation.

If You Can't Say It Clearly, You Don't Understand It Yourself