I Think The Jokes Would Have Been

It's Hard, Really, To Make Any Physical Movement That Hasn't Been Done In Another Film. If You Grab Someone's Hand, It Doesn't Mean You're Referencing Other Films With Grabbing Hands...

Plainly It Isn't An Exact Science, Despite It Being A Complex Interaction Of Micro-decisions And Corresponding Thought; Perhaps It Doesn't Always Work And We Pass By Some Potential Soulmates Like The Proverbial Ships In The Night, Never Quite Connecting. Then Again, Perhaps The System Is Tenacious And Continues To Run Like A Computer Program On Infinite Loop, So That If At First You Don't Meet, You Are Drawn Back Together For Another Try.

We've Kind Of Grown Up In A Post-star Wars Era, And What Star Wars Did To Cinema, In Terms Of An Explosion Of That Kind Of Blockbuster Culture. It's Thrown Up A Generation Of Geeks. With The Evolution Of Computer Games And The Internet, That's All Impacted On Us As A Generation, And Affected The Creative Element Of That Generation Enormously. So Whereas The Different Schools Of Filmmaking...

In The Most Basic Terms It Was About How When We Experience Art Without Critical Awareness We Consent To The Ideas Being Promoted, Either Intentionally Or Unintentionally, By The Filmmaker. For Instance, If You Watch A Racist Comedian And Laugh At His Jokes, You Are Consenting To The Prejudices Inherent Within Them. Similarly, If You Watch A Movie Which Perpetuates Conventional Ideas About Race, Gender, Etc., You Are Consenting To Them And Not Affecting Change In Any Way.

I Mean, Yeah, I'm Sure That Python And The Other Things Have Paved The Way For A Greater Understanding Of The British Sense Of Humor, But I Don't Think It's All That Different Than The American Sense Of Humor.