I Don't Pretend To Anything More Than

The Ideal In Chess Can Only Be A Collective Image, But In My Opinion It Is Capablanca Who Most Closely Approaches This.

The Days When It Was Possible To Win A Serious Game Only By Merit Of Sporting Character Or Depth Of Chess Understanding Have Vanished Forever. Chess Knowledge Has Become Dominant, Bypassing All The Other Factors That Contribute To Success.

I Like 1.e4 Very Much, But My Results Are Better With 1.d4.

The Priority Must Be The Unification Of The World Titles To Straighten Things Out. But We Should Not Wait That Long Anymore To Change The Situation, Because We Are Running Out Of Time.

By All Means Examine The Games Of The Great Chess Players, But Don't Swallow Them Whole. Their Games Are Valuable Not For Their Separate Moves, But For Their Vision Of Chess, Their Way Of Thinking.