For One To Be Free There Must

"community" Came To Be Seen As A Chat-group: You Switch On As Long As Your Pleasure Lasts, Then Push Another Button And Switch Off. Very Easy To Go In And Out, Join And Leave.

You Are A Stranger, I Am A Stranger, We All Remain Strangers, And Nevertheless We Can Like Or Even Love Each Other.

The Carrying Power Of A Bridge Is Not The Average Strength Of The Pillars, But The Strength Of The Weakest Pillar. I Have Always Believed That You Do Not Measure The Health Of A Society By Gnp But By The Condition Of Its Worst Off.

Ideally, Nothing Should Be Embraced By A Consumer Firmly, Nothing Should Command A Commitment Till Death Do Us Part, No Needs Should Be Seen As Fully Satisfied, No Desires Considered Ultimate. There Ought To Be A Proviso 'until Further Notice' Attached To Any Oath Of Loyalty And Any Commitment. It Is But The Volatility, The In-built Temporality Of All Engagements That Truly Counts; It Counts More Than The Commitment Itself, Which Is Anyway Not Allowed To Outlast The Time Necessary For Consuming The Object Of Desire (or, Rather, The Time Sufficient For The Desirability Of That Object To Wane).

An Ideal And Flawless Freedom, "complete Freedom", Enabling Without Disabling, Is I Believe An Oxymoron In Metaphysics As Much As It Is An Unreachable Goal In Social Life.