Far From Being Accidental Details, The Properties

Falsifiability For A Theory Is Great, But A Theory Can Still Be Respectable Even If It Is Not Falsifiable, As Long As It Is Verifiable.

Science Is Very Good At Answering The 'how' Questions. 'how Did The Universe Evolve To The Form That We See?' But It Is Woefully Inadequate In Addressing The 'why' Questions. 'why Is There A Universe At All?' These Are The Meaning Questions, Which Many People Think Religion Is Particularly Good At Dealing With.

That Is, You Can Have Nothingness, Absolute Nothingness For Maybe A Tiny Fraction Of A Second, If A Second Can Be Defined In That Arena, But Then It Falls Apart Into A Something And An Anti-something. And That Something Is Then What We Call The Universe. But Can We Really Understand That Or Put Rigorous Mathematics Or Testable Experiments Against That? Not Yet. So One Of The Big Holy Grail Of Physics Is To Understand Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing.

Assessing Existence While Failing To Embrace The Insights Of Modern Physics Would Be Like Wrestling In The Dark With An Unknown Opponent.

I've Had Various Experiences Where I've Been Called By Hollywood Studios To Look At A Script Or Comment On Various Scientific Ideas That They're Trying To Inject Into A Story.