Even In The Most Market-obsessed Society, We're

The Best Way To Think About Anarchism Is As A Combination Of Three Levels. On The One Hand, The Sort Of Instinctual Revulsion Against Forms Of Inequality In Power; On The Other Hand, A Reappraisal Of What One Is Already Doing In Egalitarian Relations; And Then The Projection Of These Principles On All Sorts Of Relations.

Debt - Like Sin - Implies That One Party In The Transaction Didn't Live Up To Expectations, At Least In The Moment, And Has Done Something Wrong.

The Working Poor Are The People Suffering Out Subprime Mortgages And Fatal Loans And More And More Of Our Money - You Know, Capitalism Is Operated By Extracting Money, Not So Much Directly Being Paid.

You Would Think That If Neoliberals Were In Any Way Honest, After The Collapse Of The Soviet Union The First Thing To Do Is Get Rid Of The Red Army And The Kgb, And Build Up The Economy. Instead, They Just Get Rid Of The Economy And Keep The Military And The Kgb.

Now, We're Used To Thinking Of Communism As Being Once-upon-a-time-all-things-were-owned-in-common, Maybe-someday-this-will-come-again. And People Agree That There Is A Sort Of Epic Narrative Going On Here. I Think We Should Just Throw This Narrative Out, It's Irrelevant Anyway, And Who Cares Who Owns Things? I Don't. You Know, We All Own The White House. So What? I Still Can't Go In, Right?