Confidence In Nonsense Is Required.

Nasa's Myriad Failures Are In Many Ways The Natural Consequence Of A Catastrophic Combination Of Bureaucracy, Monopoly, And A Calcifying Aversion To The Kind Of Risk Necessary For Innovation.

My Study Is Not As A Climatologist, But From A Completely Different Perspective In Which I Am An Expert … For Decades, As A Professional Experimental Test Engineer, I Have Analyzed Experimental Data And Watched Others Massage And Present Data. I Became A Cynic; My Conclusion - 'if Someone Is Aggressively Selling A Technical Product Who's Merits Are Dependent On Complex Experimental Data, He Is Likely Lying'. That Is True Whether The Product Is An Airplane Or A Carbon Credit.

Nasa Is Doing Nothing But Development. They're Not Doing Research In Manned Spaceflight At All And I See No Reason For Them To Do That Because We Already Know That It Will Work And We Already Know Exactly How It Will Work.

The Russians Did Much Bigger Space Launch Vehicles For Launching Satellites And For Getting Men In Orbit. They Did That Much Sooner Than America Because America Was Very Good At Something Else.

Since Yuri Gagarin And Al Shepard's Epoch Flights In 1961, All Space Missions Have Been Flown Only Under Large, Expensive Government Efforts. By Contrast, Our Program Involves A Few, Dedicated Individuals Who Are Focused Entirely On Making Spaceflight Affordable.