But In The Years Since The Neoliberal

You Would Think That If Neoliberals Were In Any Way Honest, After The Collapse Of The Soviet Union The First Thing To Do Is Get Rid Of The Red Army And The Kgb, And Build Up The Economy. Instead, They Just Get Rid Of The Economy And Keep The Military And The Kgb.

The Working Poor Are The People Suffering Out Subprime Mortgages And Fatal Loans And More And More Of Our Money - You Know, Capitalism Is Operated By Extracting Money, Not So Much Directly Being Paid.

If History Shows Anything, It Is That There's No Better Way To Justify Relations Founded On Violence, To Make Such Relations Seem Moral, Than By Reframing Them In The Language Of Debt—above All, Because It Immediately Makes It Seem That It's The Victim Who's Doing Something Wrong.

What About Precarious Labor? It's Actually Not The Most Efficient Form Of Labor At All. They Were Much More Efficient When They Had Loyalty To Their Workers And People Were Allowed To Be Creative And Contribute - You Know That What Precarious Labor Does Is That It's The Best Weapon Ever Made To Depoliticize Labor. They're Always Putting The Political In Front Of The Economic.

The Fascinating Thing About Standard Economic Stories Is Exactly That: They Assume That Everybody Wants That Kind Of Closure. That All Human Relations Are Forms Of Exchange, Because If Everything Is An Exchange Then It's True That We're Both Equals. We Walk Up, I Give You Something, You Give Me Something, And We Walk Away. Or I Give You Something, You Don't Give Me Something Right Now, And You Owe Me. So If We Have Any Ongoing Relationships At All, It's Because Somebody Is In Debt.