Because A Truly Skeptical Position Would Be

I Think That Creativity Depends On Having Sufficient Indeterminacy Around For A New Pattern To Arise Up Within It.

The Gaia Hypothesis Of James Lovelock [and Lynn Margulis] Puts Forward A Scientific View Of The Living Earth, Which In One Respect Is Modern, Empherical, Scientific, In Another Respect Re-awakens An Ancient Archetype, Which In Fact Is So Clearly Suggested By The Very Name Of The Hypothesis, Gaia, The Greek Name For Mother Earth.

At The Moment Of Insight, A Potential Pattern Of Organized Behavior Comes Into Being.

In No Other Field Of Scientific Endeavor Do Otherwise Intelligent People Feel Free To Make Public Claims Based On Prejudice And Ignorance. Yet In Relation To Psychic Phenomena, Committed Materialists Feel Free To Disregard The Evidence And Behave Irrationally And Unscientifically, While Claiming To Speak In The Name Of Science And Reason. They Abuse The Authority Of Science And Bring Rationalism Into Disrepute.

Most Of Nature Is Inherently Chaotic. It's Not Rigidly Determined In The Old Sense. It's Not Rigidly Predictable.