A Search Is A Search, Even If

If We're Picking People To Draw Out Of Their Own Conscience And Experience A 'new' Constitution, We Should Not Look Principally For Good Lawyers. We Should Look To People Who Agree With Us. When We Are In That Mode, You Realize We Have Rendered The Constitution Useless.

More Importantly, The Court Forgets That Ours Is A Government Of Laws And Not Of Men. That Means We Are Governed By The Terms Of Our Laws, Not By The Unenacted Will Of Our Lawmakers. 'if Congress Enacted Into Law Something Different From What It Intended, Then It Should Amend The Statute To Conform To Its Intent.' In The Meantime, This Court 'has No Roving License ... To Disregard Clear Language Simply On The View That ... Congress 'must Have Intended' Something Broader.

One Can Be Sophisticated And Believe In God. Reason And Intellect Are Not To Be Laid Aside Where Matters Of Religion Are Concerned.

The Court's Job Is To Uphold The Constitution And You Don't Call That Off In Times Of Crisis. Would The Framers Have Allowed This Practice?

[the] Government Has Room To Scale Back Individual Rights During Wartime Without Violating The Constitution. The Constitution Just Sets Minimums. Most Of The Rights That You Enjoy Go Way Beyond What The Constitution Requires.