A Law Can Be Both Economic Folly

Scalia Said The Court Had Pretty Much Signed On To The So-called Homosexual Agenda, Adding: Let Me Be Clear That I Have Nothing Against Homosexuals, Or Any Other Group, Promoting Their Agenda Through Normal Democratic Means.

Rather Than Rewriting The Law Under The Pretense Of Interpreting It, The Court Should Have Left It To Congress To Decide What To Do About The Act's Limitation Of Tax Credits To State Exchanges.

You Could Have 50 Different States Having 50 Different Regulations... Until They Were All Litigated Out.

The Principal Purpose Of Stare Decisis Is To Protect Reliance Interest And Further Stability In The Law.

If We Cannot Have Moral Feelings Against Homosexuality, Can We Have It Against Murder? Can We Have It Against Other Things?